readahead_batch_length(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… readahead_batch_length β€” from the Kernel API Manual, bestie

Okay so picture this: you're deep in readahead_batch_length(9) territory, and this little icon of a function is here to tell you the number of bytes in the current batch. That's it. That's the whole vibe. She's not complicated, she's just useful ✨


🌸 NAME 🌸

readahead_batch_length β€” literally just the number of bytes in the current batch, no cap 🫢


πŸŽ€ SYNOPSIS πŸŽ€

size_t readahead_batch_length (const struct readahead_control *rac );

Like, you hand her one pointer and she hands you a size_t back. Balanced. Symmetrical. Main character energy πŸ”₯


πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • rac β€” the readahead request itself, aka the whole const struct readahead_control * situation. This is the thing you're asking about, so like… don't forget to pass it πŸ’–

🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

She runs with a huge friend group, and honestly? Every single one of them matters. First up, the neighbourhood: the Kernel file ./include/linux/pagemap.h. Then the whole crew πŸ‘‘

Not one of these got left out, bestie β€” the whole group chat is invited πŸ’€

✨ that's the page ✨ brought to you straight from ./include/linux, dated October 2026, and signed readahead_batch_length(9) β€” mwah, go read your kernel docs, ily πŸ§šπŸ’œ

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from