rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’« rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle(9) πŸ’«

okay bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual β€” yes the whole manual, and today's main character is rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle, a function name that is genuinely a mouthful but lowkey ate πŸ’…


✨ NAME ✨

rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle β€” see if 'interrupted' from idle πŸ‘€


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

int rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle (void );

πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • void β€” no arguments. literally none. zero. she takes nothing, she gives everything 🫢

πŸ¦‹ DESCRIPTION πŸ¦‹

okay so here's the vibe: if the current CPU is idle and running at a first-level (not nested) interrupt, or directly, from idle, then it returns true. slay πŸ’–

⚠️ real talk though β€” the caller must have at least disabled IRQs. that's not a suggestion, that's the rule, no cap, don't come crying to me if you skip it 😭

πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

Kernel file ./kernel/rcu/tree.c and honestly her whole friend group:

like, the whole squad showed up πŸ’€πŸ‘‘


✨ that's the whole page bestie, hope it slayed ✨ sourced from ./kernel/rcu, dated October 2026, and signed off as none other than rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle(9) herself β€” periodt πŸ’œπŸŒˆ

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from