radix_tree_tag_set(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… radix_tree_tag_set(9) β€” a kernel API manual moment

okay bestie, welcome to radix_tree_tag_set(9) from the Kernel API Manual. yes, the whole manual. buckle up πŸŽ€


✨ NAME ✨

radix_tree_tag_set β€” set a tag on a radix tree node. that's it. that's the whole vibe check πŸ¦‹


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

void * radix_tree_tag_set (struct radix_tree_root *root , unsigned long
index , unsigned int tag );

literally just copy-paste that and you're in business, no cap πŸ’…


πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • root β€” the radix tree root. the main character of the operation, the place where it all begins πŸ‘‘
  • index β€” the index key. this is which spot in the tree we're talking about, iykyk πŸ”‘
  • tag β€” the tag index. the little label we're sticking on there 🏷️

πŸ’– DESCRIPTION πŸ’–

so here's the tea: this sets the search tag corresponding to index in the radix tree. and bestie, it doesn't stop halfway β€” it does it from the root all the way down to the leaf node. the whole path. obsessed with the commitment fr fr 🌈

the tag you pass must be < RADIX_TREE_MAX_TAGS. that's a hard requirement, not a suggestion, so pls respect it πŸ™ˆ

it returns the address of the tagged item. so you get something back β€” slay ✨

ok but real talk: setting a tag on a not-present item is a bug. like, not a "haha oops" bug, an actual bug. do not do it. consider this your warning 🚨

πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

the kernel file ./lib/radix-tree.c is where all the magic lives, and here's the whole friend group πŸ’œ


and that's the whole page, bestie!! mwah πŸ’‹ this one's brought to you by ./lib and dated October 2026 β€” write it in your calendar, screenshot it, frame it, whatever 🫢 πŸ’… πŸŽ€

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from