qcom_q6v5_wait_for_start(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’– qcom_q6v5_wait_for_start(9) πŸ’–

okay so this is a page straight out of the Kernel API Manual, and it's about qcom_q6v5_wait_for_start β€” literally just sitting there waiting for the remote processor to hit you with that start signal. patient queen energy fr fr πŸŽ€


✨ NAME ✨

qcom_q6v5_wait_for_start β€” wait for remote processor start signal

like, you're waiting. for the start signal. from the remote processor. that's the whole vibe πŸ’…


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

int qcom_q6v5_wait_for_start (struct qcom_q6v5 *q6v5 , int timeout );

πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • q6v5 β€” your reference to the qcom_q6v5 context, i.e. the whole situation you're working with 🫢
  • timeout β€” how long you're willing to wait for the event, measured in jiffies (yes, jiffies, not seconds, don't come for me) ⏳

πŸ’€ DESCRIPTION πŸ’€

real talk: qcom_q6v5_unprepare should not be called when this function fails. that's it, that's the whole description, and it's lowkey the most important sentence on this page so don't skip it πŸ™ˆ

no cap, if this call fails, do not go call qcom_q6v5_unprepare. that's the rule. periodt.

⭐ RETURN ⭐

  • 0 on success πŸŽ‰ slay
  • -ETIMEDOUT on timeout 😭 the waiting game did not pay off

πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

like a whole friend group of functions, iykyk πŸ’œ


and that's the page!! this lil masterpiece lives over in ./drivers/remoteproc, dated October 2026, and it's part of the Kernel API Manual β€” mwah, go read the source bestie, ily, bye πŸ§šπŸ’–βœ¨

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from