ptp_clock_register(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… ptp_clock_register(9) πŸ’…

okay so this is a page from the Kernel API Manual, bestie β€” we're in ptp_clock_register(9) territory and honestly? it's giving "small function, big responsibilities" energy. Let's get into it 🫢


✨ NAME ✨

ptp_clock_register β€” the function that registers a PTP hardware clock driver πŸ‘‘

✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

struct ptp_clock * ptp_clock_register (struct ptp_clock_info *info ,
       struct device *parent );

like, it takes two args and hands you back a struct ptp_clock *. slay.

✨ ARGUMENTS ✨

  • info β€” the structure that describes the brand new clock you're bringing into the world 🌸 it's literally the whole personality of your clock ngl
  • parent β€” a pointer to the parent device of that new clock πŸŽ€ iykyk, it's the clock's parent device, no cap

✨ RETURN ✨

so here's the vibe check on what comes back:

  • a valid pointer on success πŸ”₯
  • or PTR_ERR on failure πŸ’€
⚠️ but wait β€” there's a plot twist: if PHC support is missing at the configuration level, this function returns NULL, and drivers are expected to gracefully handle that case separately. like, not me having to write a whole separate branch for it 😭 handle it gracefully, bestie, it's giving main character energy for your error path.

✨ SEE ALSO ✨

okay this list is LONG and every single one of these is iconic in its own right, so buckle in πŸ¦‹

like, go read all of them. seriously. the whole friend group ate πŸ’…βœ¨


and that's the page!! this one lives out of ./include/linux in the October 2026 edition of the manual, so if you ever forget where it came from: that's the source, that's the date, no cap πŸŽ€πŸ«Ά bye bestie, go register some clocks ⭐🌈

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from