postcore_param_cb(9)
β¨ postcore_param_cb(9) β¨
okay so bestie, we're in the Kernel API Manual today and the star of the show is postcore_param_cb π β literally the general callback for a module/cmdline parameter that gets evaluated before the postcore initcall level. iykyk π
πΈ SYNOPSIS πΈ
postcore_param_cb (name , ops , arg , perm );
π ARGUMENTS π
nameβ a valid C identifier that's the parameter name. yes bestie, it has to be a valid C identifier, no funny business πopsβ the set & get operations for this parameter πargβ the args foropsπ«Άpermβ visibility in sysfs β
π¦ DESCRIPTION π¦
so the ops can have NULL set or get functions. that's it, that's the whole vibe check β¨ β no cap, it's giving "simple but iconic."
π₯ SEE ALSO π₯
go look at the kernel file ./include/linux/moduleparam.h and then go absolutely feral over these siblings, fr fr:
module_param(9)module_param_unsafe(9)module_param_named(9)module_param_named_unsafe(9)module_param_cb(9)core_param_cb(9)arch_param_cb(9)subsys_param_cb(9)fs_param_cb(9)device_param_cb(9)late_param_cb(9)core_param(9)core_param_unsafe(9)__core_param_cb(9)module_param_string(9)parameq(9)parameqn(9)module_param_array(9)module_param_array_named(9)module_param_hw_named(9)module_param_hw_array(9)
mwah π that's the whole page β brought to you from ./include/linux, dated October 2026, and it's postcore_param_cb(9) saying byeee π§
π¦ where this page comes from
- nixpkgs unstable: linux-manual 7.3.1
- π girlified by deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms