posix_clock_register(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

okay so, bestie, welcome to posix_clock_register(9) from the Kernel API Manual β€” the page for registering a new clock, and the way it's giving clock-driver main character energy is honestly iconic. πŸ•°οΈβœ¨

πŸ’– NAME πŸ’–

posix_clock_register β€” register a new clock. That's the whole vibe: one function, one job, clock gets registered. periodt. πŸ•°οΈ

✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

Here's the signature, copied exactly, no edits bestie:

       int posix_clock_register (struct posix_clock *clk , struct device *dev
       );

πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • clk β€” pointer to the clock. The caller must provide the 'ops' field β€” that part is required, bestie. No ops, no clock registration energy, fr fr.
  • dev β€” pointer to the initialized device. The original text is literally β€œCaller must provide” and then just stops 😭 β€” so that's all the detail on the page; I'm not making up the rest, periodt.

πŸ¦‹ DESCRIPTION πŸ¦‹

A clock driver calls this function to register itself with the clock device subsystem. That's the whole point β€” clock driver says hi to the clock device subsystem, and this function is the intro. πŸ‘‘

If clk points to dynamically allocated memory, then the caller must provide a 'release' function to free that memory. That's the memory-cleanup requirement, not a vibe suggestion. 🧚

Returns zero on success, non-zero otherwise. Slay on zero, check the non-zero. βœ…

🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

Go peek at these if you want the full lore:

  • Kernel file ./include/linux/posix-clock.h
  • struct posix_clock_operations(9)
  • struct posix_clock(9)
  • struct posix_clock_context(9)
  • posix_clock_unregister(9)

source: ./include/linux Β· date: October 2026 Β· page: posix_clock_register(9) β€” mwah, go register that clock responsibly πŸ’œπŸ¦‹

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from