plist_node_empty(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… plist_node_empty β€” the Kernel API Manual moment πŸŽ€

okay so bestie, this one is from the Kernel API Manual (that's the manual name, we're not copying the header line, we're just ✨acknowledging✨ it), and it's literally the tiniest little vibe check in the whole plist family. Let me tell you about it 🫢


🌸 NAME 🌸

plist_node_empty β€” returns !0 if plist_node is not on a list

yes you read that right, the naming is giving chaotic-but-iconic πŸ’€ it's "empty" but the doc line says it returns !0 when the node is not on a list. Do not ask me to explain the branding, I just report it fr fr. Copy the behaviour exactly, don't second-guess it.

✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

int plist_node_empty (const struct plist_node *node );

that's it. that's the whole function signature. no cap, she's small but she's main character energy πŸ‘‘


πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • node β€” a struct plist_node pointer πŸ’– (this is the node you're asking about, the one you want the empty-or-not tea on)

🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

okay so there's a whole friend group here, and honestly? obsessed. they all live in the kernel file ./include/linux/plist.h πŸ“:

like, the whole plist crew showed up to the group chat 😭 go read them, iykyk πŸ’œ


πŸ’Œ and that's the page, bestie β€” brought to you by the source path ./include/linux, dated October 2026, filed under plist_node_empty(9). mwah, slay, stay hydrated πŸ§šπŸ’…

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from