pldm_parse_one_record(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

🌸 pldm_parse_one_record β€” a Kernel API Manual moment (yes, section 9 bestie) 🌸

okay so this is a page from the Kernel API Manual, and it's literally all about one tiny little function called pldm_parse_one_record. it does one job and it does it iconically: it vibe-checks a single PLDM record. πŸŽ€


✨ NAME ✨

pldm_parse_one_record β€” verify the size of one PLDM record. that's it. that's the whole job. she's a size-checker and she's booked and busy πŸ’…


πŸ¦‹ SYNOPSIS πŸ¦‹

int pldm_parse_one_record (struct pldmfw_priv *data , const struct
       __pldmfw_record_info *__record );

like, exactly that. no cap. copy it character for character or don't come to the group chat 🫢


πŸ’– ARGUMENTS πŸ’–

  • data β€” pointer to the image details. the whole picture. the main character's lore, if you will πŸ‘‘
  • __record β€” pointer to the record you actually want to check. the one getting the vibe check πŸ”

🌈 DESCRIPTION 🌈

okay so picture this: this function checks that the record size does not exceed either of these two things:

  • the size of the firmware file πŸ“
  • the total length specified in the header section πŸ“

both. either. she's checking against both and she is not being chill about it.

and THEN β€” because she's thorough, because she ate and left no crumbs β€” she also verifies that the recorded length of the start of the record matches the size you get by adding up all of these together:

  • the static structure length
  • the component bitmap length
  • the version string length
  • the length of all descriptor TLVs
  • the length of the package data

add 'em up, compare, slay. if the recorded length and the calculated length agree, we're so back. if not, she notices. πŸ‘€


πŸ”₯ RETURN πŸ”₯

  • zero on success β€” iconic, flawless, we love to see it ✨
  • a negative error code on failure β€” it's giving "something's off bestie" 😭

πŸ’œ SEE ALSO πŸ’œ

so many siblings, honestly a whole family reunion 🧚. the kernel file lives at ./lib/pldmfw/pldmfw.c, and these are all the functions you might wanna go visit next:


πŸ’€ real talk: every single number, pointer and length here matters. this is one of those functions where "close enough" is not the vibe. if the lengths don't match exactly, she returns a negative error code and you will be hearing about it.

anyway that's the page!! mwah πŸ’‹ this one's filed under ./lib/pldmfw, dated October 2026, and it's pldm_parse_one_record(9) forever and always πŸŽ€βœ¨πŸ¦‹

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from