pinctrl_register_mappings(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… pinctrl_register_mappings(9) β€” from the Kernel API Manual, bestie ✨

okay so. picture this: you're deep in the kernel, you've got a whole table of pin mappings, and literally nobody knows about them yet. bestie, that's the whole plot. this page is the pinctrl_register_mappings origin story and honestly it's giving main character energy πŸŽ€


✨ NAME ✨

pinctrl_register_mappings β€” register a set of pin controller mappings πŸ¦‹

like, you show up with your mappings table and the pin control core is like "say less, they're mine now."


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

int pinctrl_register_mappings (const struct pinctrl_map *maps , unsigned
       int num_maps );

the way that function signature ate and left no crumbs πŸ”₯ returns an int, bestie β€” don't forget that part.


πŸ’– ARGUMENTS πŸ’–

  • maps β€” the pincontrol mappings table to register. and here's the tea πŸ«–: the pinctrl-core keeps a reference to the passed in maps, so they should _not_ be marked with __initdata. like, no cap, if you mark them with __initdata you're setting yourself up for a bad time. the underscores around _not_ are there because the kernel devs are dramatic and correct πŸ’€
  • num_maps β€” the number of maps in the mapping table. just a count. a little integer doing its little job 😌 count your maps, bestie, don't guess.

πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

kernel file ./drivers/pinctrl/core.c β€” that's the icon, the legend, the moment πŸ‘‘

and now the full roll call, no one left behind, every single one of them πŸ’œ:


🫢 friendly reminder before you go: maps stays referenced by the core, so _not_ __initdata. iykyk. that's the whole vibe check of this page and it passed πŸ’…

and that's the page, bestie πŸ’– straight out of ./drivers/pinctrl, dated October 2026, and yeah β€” it's pinctrl_register_mappings(9) all the way down. slay πŸŒˆβœ¨πŸŽ€

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from