pcpu_balance_free(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… pcpu_balance_free β€” the Kernel API Manual one, bestie ✨

Okay so picture this: it's pcpu_balance_free(9) from the Kernel API Manual, and she's here to manage the amount of free chunks. That's literally the whole vibe. πŸŽ€


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

void pcpu_balance_free (bool empty_only );

No return value, no drama, she just does the thing and leaves. Iconic behavior honestly.


πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • empty_only β€” when this is true, she'll only free chunks if there are no populated pages in them. Like, she checks the vibe first. Respectful queen. πŸ‘‘

πŸ’– DESCRIPTION πŸ’–

So here's the tea, bestie:

  • If empty_only is false β€” she's reclaiming all fully free chunks, regardless of how many populated pages they have. No filter, no hesitation. She's taking everything that qualifies. πŸ”₯
  • Otherwise (so, if empty_only is true) β€” she's only reclaiming the chunks that have no populated pages. Strictly the empty ones. Nothing more. πŸ’…

That's it, that's the whole function. Not me being obsessed with a chunk-reclaiming routine but here we are. 🫢


⭐ CONTEXT ⭐

She runs holding pcpu_lock β€” but plot twist, the lock can be dropped temporarily. So yeah, she's flexible like that. 🌈


πŸŽ€ SEE ALSO πŸŽ€

All her friends, all in the kernel file ./mm/percpu.c. Impeccable guest list, no notes:


Heads up bestie: everything above lives in ./mm, and this page is dated October 2026. Yes, a future date. She's ahead of her time, we love a forward-thinking queen. πŸ§šπŸ’œ

Anyway mwah, go read the source, ily, bye! πŸ“πŸ’€βœ¨

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from