pci_ats_required(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… pci_ats_required(9) πŸ’…

okay so this is a page straight out of the Kernel API Manual, and honestly? it's a short one but it eats. let's get into it bestie 🫢


✨ NAME ✨

pci_ats_required β€” whether the PCI device requires ATS 🌸

(like, does this device need it to function at all? that's the whole question, no cap)


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

bool pci_ats_required (struct pci_dev *pdev );

it returns a bool, it takes one pointer, it's giving minimal and iconic πŸ’…


✨ ARGUMENTS ✨

  • pdev β€” the PCI device πŸŽ€ (that's it. that's the whole argument list. main character energy fr fr)

✨ DESCRIPTION ✨

so here's the vibe check: this function returns true if the PCI device requires ATS for basic functional operation. πŸ”₯

like, not "would be nice to have", not "optional upgrade" β€” required. if it needs ATS just to do its basic job, you get true. otherwise you don't. periodt. πŸ‘‘

lowkey the most straightforward function in the whole ATS saga and I respect it for that.


✨ SEE ALSO ✨

the kernel file lives at ./drivers/pci/ats.c and honestly the whole squad is linked here, so let me introduce you πŸ’–

that's the whole group chat bestie, go read them all πŸ¦‹βœ¨


ngl if you were looking for drama or undefined behaviour, this page has none β€” just a clean little boolean. sometimes peace is the vibe 🧚

and that's a wrap!! this came from ./drivers/pci in the gorgeous month of October 2026 β€” stay slay, stay boolean, and remember: ATS is required for some devices and that's just their truth πŸ’œπŸŽ€βœ¨

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from