pccard_validate_cis(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… pccard_validate_cis(9) β€” Kernel API Manual energy ✨

okay so bestie, welcome to the pccard_validate_cis glow-up page πŸ’– this one lives in the Kernel API Manual and it's basically the vibe-check function for your PCMCIA card's CIS. no cap.


✨ NAME ✨

pccard_validate_cis β€” check whether card has a sensible CIS πŸŽ€


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

int pccard_validate_cis (struct pcmcia_socket *s , unsigned int *info );

like, that's the whole mood. one function, two arguments, zero drama (hopefully) πŸ’…


πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • s β€” the struct pcmcia_socket we are to check πŸ‘€ this is the thing getting the full inspection, main character energy fr fr
  • info β€” returns the number of tuples in the (valid) CIS, or 0 ✨ so it's your little report card: a real number if everything's cute, a flat 0 if the CIS is giving red flags πŸ’€

🧚 DESCRIPTION 🧚

okay so what does it actually do? this function tries to determine if a card has a sensible CIS. that's the whole mission 🫢

and in info, it returns the number of tuples in the CIS, or 0 if the CIS looks bad. so 0 is the "not slaying" answer, iykyk 😭

the checks include (and yes, all of them matter):

  • making sure several critical tuples are present and valid βœ…
  • seeing if the total number of tuples is reasonable 🧐
  • looking for tuples that use reserved codes 🚩

and the function returns 0 on success 🌈 iconic behaviour, honestly.

ngl, if you get a 0 in info, that's the CIS failing its vibe check β€” not a win. read it carefully bestie πŸ’€

πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

like, go read those too, they're part of the lore πŸ“šβœ¨


and that's the page! πŸŽ€ brought to you by the fine folks over at ./drivers/pcmcia, stamped October 2026 β€” mwah, love that for us πŸ’–βœ¨πŸ‘‘

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from