open_exec(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… open_exec β€” like, the Kernel API Manual girlies know ✨

okay so bestie, buckle up, because we're talking about open_exec(9) from the Kernel API Manual and honestly? she's a little wrapper with main character energy πŸŽ€


🌸 NAME 🌸

open_exec β€” opens a path name for execution, periodt πŸ’–


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

struct file * open_exec (const char *name );

that's it. that's the whole signature. iconic, lowkey 🫢


πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • name β€” the path name you're opening, and you're opening it with the intent of executing it, okay? like, that's the whole vibe check for this one πŸ”₯

πŸ’œ DESCRIPTION πŸ’œ

so here's what she does: on failure she returns ERR_PTR, and on success you get an allocated struct file back. slay πŸ’…

but ngl, the important lore is this: she's a wrapper for the internal do_open_execat, and because of that, callers must call exe_file_allow_write_access before fput on release. yes, must. not "should", not "if you feel like it" β€” must. the way that this is non-negotiable is honestly giving rules-are-rules 😭

also, go look at do_close_execat too. she's part of the story, fr fr πŸ‘‘


🧚 SEE ALSO 🧚

go read them, iykyk πŸ“šβœ¨


bestie reminder: exe_file_allow_write_access before fput on release. don't forget, or it's giving bad time πŸ’€

and that's the page!! brought to you by ./fs, October 2026, mwah πŸ’–πŸŒˆβ­

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from