ns_tree_node_empty(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… ns_tree_node_empty β€” a Kernel API Manual moment

ok so bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual entry for ns_tree_node_empty β€” it's a 9-section page (well, section 9, the kernel API one, you get it πŸ’–) and honestly it's short and iconic and we love that for it.


✨ NAME ✨

ns_tree_node_empty β€” the little function that checks whether a namespace tree node is empty πŸŽ€


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

bool ns_tree_node_empty (const struct ns_tree_node *node );

like, that's the whole thing. no notes. ate. πŸ‘‘


πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • node β€” the node you're checking, bestie. that's the one. that's the node. 🫢

⭐ DESCRIPTION ⭐

ok so here's the whole vibe: it returns true if the node is not in any tree. yes, that's the entire description and no we are not elaborating, the manpage said what it said πŸ’€

lowkey obsessed with how short this is. no cap, it's giving "I said what I said" energy.

🧚 SEE ALSO 🧚


aaaand that's the page! no errors, no exit statuses, no env vars, no bugs section β€” just pure, unbothered, minimal energy 🌸

sign-off szn: this one's from ./kernel, dated October 2026, and it's literally titled ns_tree_node_empty(9) in case you forgot already πŸ™ˆ mwah, go check those nodes bestie πŸ’…βœ¨

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from