nft_pipapo_remove(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… nft_pipapo_remove(9) β€” like, the Kernel API Manual page, bestie πŸŽ€

Okay so this is nft_pipapo_remove from the Kernel API Manual β€” yes, the whole page is literally named after the function, we love a title-drop moment ✨


✨ NAME ✨

nft_pipapo_remove β€” remove an element given its key, then commit 🫢


πŸ¦‹ SYNOPSIS πŸ¦‹

void nft_pipapo_remove (const struct net *net , const struct nft_set
*set , struct nft_elem_priv *elem_priv );

That's the whole signature, no cap. void return, three args, go off πŸ‘‘


🌸 ARGUMENTS 🌸

  • net β€” the network namespace. Like, the whole vibe-container this is happening inside πŸ’œ
  • set β€” the nftables API set representation. The set. The main character πŸ”₯
  • elem_priv β€” the nftables API element representation that's carrying the key data. It's giving "I know the key" energy πŸ—οΈ

🧚 DESCRIPTION 🧚

So, similarly to nft_pipapo_activate, this function gets used as a commit operation by the API β€” but here's the twist: it's called once per element in the pending transaction. Which means we literally cannot implement it as a single commit operation, bestie, it's just not that kind of function 😭

The closest we can get is to remove the matched element right here, if there is one, and then commit the updated matching data. That's the assignment, and it ate πŸ’…

Fr fr though β€” "if any" is doing real work in that sentence. No matched element, no removal. Don't come for me, that's just what the page says πŸ™ˆ

🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

Okay this list is long and honestly iconic, here we go, every single one πŸ‘‘:


And that's the page, periodt 🫢 sourced from ./net/netfilter under the Kernel API Manual, dated October 2026 β€” mwah, thanks for reading bestie, ily, go remove some elements πŸ’–βœ¨πŸ“

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from