nft_pipapo_avx2_fill(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

✨ nft_pipapo_avx2_fill(9) ✨

ok so this is a page from the Kernel API Manual and it's about one lil' function that's lowkey the backbone of a whole bitmap situation πŸ’… pulling up the whole gang: nft_pipapo_avx2_fill and friends, all documented in nft_pipapo_avx2_fill(9) β€” yes bestie, the function and the manpage have the same name, it's giving main character energy πŸ‘‘


πŸŽ€ NAME πŸŽ€

nft_pipapo_avx2_fill β€” fill a bitmap region with ones. that's it. that's the vibe. filling bits with 1s ✨


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

void nft_pipapo_avx2_fill (unsigned long *data , int start , int len );

πŸ’– ARGUMENTS πŸ’–

  • data β€” the base memory area, aka where the bits live, aka the home address of your bitmap 🏠
  • start β€” the first bit to set. where the party begins πŸŽ‰
  • len β€” count of bits to fill. how many bits are getting invited 🫢

πŸ¦‹ DESCRIPTION πŸ¦‹

ok so picture this: it's literally nothing else than a version of bitmap_set β€” the same one used, e.g., by pipapo_refill β€” except it's been tailored for the microarchitectures that use it and it's better suited for this specific usage πŸ‘‘

and why is it built like that? because it's very likely that we'll set a small number of bits, and those bits are not crossing a word boundary β€” so your branch prediction needs to be correct, and honestly? correct branch prediction is critical here. no cap. the CPU is out here guessing and we cannot let it guess wrong 😭

plot twist: this function doesn't actually use any AVX2 instruction. the name is a little misleading, bestie. it's the vibe of AVX2, not the instructions πŸ™ˆ

πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

kernel file ./net/netfilter/nft_set_pipapo_avx2.c β€” go read the source, iykyk πŸ“–

and the whole squad, no one left behind:


ok that's the whole page, slay πŸ’œ this one came from ./net/netfilter, dated October 2026, and it's filed under nft_pipapo_avx2_fill(9) β€” go forth and fill those bits, bestie πŸŽ€βœ¨

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from