nfs_start_io_read(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’– nfs_start_io_read β€” it's giving "this file is doing buffered reads now" ✨

So bestie, this one's from the Kernel API Manual and it's lowkey iconic β€” it's the little function that tells the kernel "hey, a buffered read is about to happen, pls handle the locking for me" 🫢


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

int nfs_start_io_read (struct inode *inode );

🌸 ARGUMENTS 🌸

  • inode β€” the file inode, aka the main character of this whole operation πŸ‘‘

πŸ¦‹ DESCRIPTION πŸ¦‹

Okay so what this does: it declares that a buffered read operation is about to start, and on top of that it makes sure we block all direct I/O πŸ’…

On exit, the function makes sure that the NFS_INO_ODIRECT flag is unset, and it holds a shared lock on inode->i_rwsem to ensure that the flag can't be changed. Fr fr, that's the whole safety mechanism.

In practice, this means buffered read operations are allowed to execute in parallel β€” thanks to the shared lock, bestie, it's teamwork ✨ β€” whereas direct I/O operations need to wait to grab an exclusive lock in order to set NFS_INO_ODIRECT. So they're literally queuing up πŸ™ˆ

Heads up: buffered writes and truncates both take a write lock on inode->i_rwsem, meaning that those are serialised with respect to the reads. Not parallel. Serialised. Periodt. πŸ’€

πŸ‘‘ SEE ALSO πŸ‘‘


That's the whole vibe check, bestie β€” go read those siblings next, iykyk πŸŒˆπŸ’œ

Source: ./fs/nfs Β· Date: October 2026 Β· Kernel API Manual Β· nfs_start_io_read(9) β€” mwah, hope this slayed for you πŸŽ€πŸ¦‹πŸ’–

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from