nfs_find_best_sec(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… nfs_find_best_sec(9) πŸ’…

okay so bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual β€” this one's a 9 section page, kernel internals, very main character energy. We're talking about nfs_find_best_sec β€” the little function that goes "which security flavor do we all actually vibe with?" πŸ¦‹


✨ NAME ✨

nfs_find_best_sec β€” find a security mechanism supported locally 🌸


πŸŽ€ SYNOPSIS πŸŽ€

struct rpc_clnt * nfs_find_best_sec (struct rpc_clnt *clnt , struct
nfs_server *server , struct nfs4_secinfo_flavors *flavors );

🫢 ARGUMENTS 🫢

  • clnt β€” pointer to rpc_clnt. just a lil pointer, she's just standing there πŸ’…
  • server β€” the NFS server struct, iykyk
  • flavors β€” the list of security tuples that came back from the SECINFO procedure ✨

πŸ”₯ DESCRIPTION πŸ”₯

So what she does: she returns an rpc client that uses the first security mechanism in flavors that is locally supported. Literally the first one that works for us, no cap. πŸ‘‘

The flavors array gets searched in the order returned from the server, per the RFC 3530 recommendation β€” the server's order is the order, periodt. And each flavor gets checked for membership in the sec= mount option list, if it exists. (key words: if it exists 🫢)

⚠️ If no matching flavor is found in the array, she returns -EPERM. no match, no vibe check passed, that's the rule 😭
🚨 Please call rpc_shutdown_client when you are done with this rpc client. like actually. don't just ghost it, clean up after yourself bestie πŸ’€

🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈


and that's the whole page, bestie, we ate and left no crumbs πŸ“βœ¨ she lives in ./fs/nfs, dated October 2026, and she answers to the name nfs_find_best_sec(9) β€” mwah πŸ’‹πŸŽ€

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from