nf_ct_resolve_clash_harder(9)
π nf_ct_resolve_clash_harder(9) β like, the Kernel API Manual one, bestie π
okay so this is nf_ct_resolve_clash_harder from the Kernel API Manual (nf_ct_resolve_clash_harder(9), yes the title and the manual name are literally the same thing, we love a consistent queen β¨). sit down, grab a strawberry drink π, and let's get into it.
πΈ NAME πΈ
nf_ct_resolve_clash_harder β bestie's whole job is attempting to insert a clashing conntrack entry π
π¦ SYNOPSIS π¦
int nf_ct_resolve_clash_harder (struct sk_buff *skb , u32 repl_idx );
that's it. that's the signature. copy it exactly, no cap, or the compiler will simply end you π
β¨ ARGUMENTS β¨
skbβ theskbthat causes the collision π like, this is the packet that started all the drama.repl_idxβ the hash slot for the reply direction π that's the little address where the reply side lives.
π DESCRIPTION π
so the way this works is: this function gets called when the origin direction or the reply direction had a clash π₯
and here's the good news β the skb can still be handled without packet drop, provided that either the reply direction is unique β¨, or the existing entry has the identical tuple in both directions π«Ά. iykyk.
β οΈ real talk though: the caller must hold conntrack table locks to prevent concurrent updates. not optional. not a vibe. hold the locks fr fr π
it returns NF_DROP if the clash could not be handled π so like, if it couldn't sort it out, the packet's getting dropped, periodt.
π SEE ALSO π
- the kernel file
./net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.cπ (yes, go read the source, main character energy) nf_ct_match_reverse(9)nf_ct_resolve_clash(9)nf_ct_iterate_destroy(9)
all of these are linked, all of these matter, don't skip them π
mwah π that's the whole page. sourced from ./net/netfilter, dated October 2026 β go off, kernel docs, you ate πβ¨
π¦ where this page comes from
- nixpkgs unstable: linux-manual 7.3.1
- π girlified by deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms