netlbl_skbuff_setattr(9)

💅 NAME 💅

Okay so this is the netlbl_skbuff_setattr(9) page from the Kernel API Manual, bestie, and it is literally about labeling a packet using the correct protocol. No cap. 🎀

✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

int netlbl_skbuff_setattr (struct sk_buff *skb , u16 family , const
       struct netlbl_lsm_secattr *secattr );

🎀 ARGUMENTS 🎀

• skb — the packet. Like, the actual packet you're dealing with. 🫶
• family — protocol family. It's giving "which family are we in" energy. 🌸
• secattr — the security attributes. The security vibe-check info. 🔥

🦋 DESCRIPTION 🦋

So the whole move here is: attach the correct label to the given packet, using the security attributes specified in secattr. That's the tea. 💖

And the return situation? It returns zero on success, and negative values on failure. So 0 is the slay outcome, negative is the "bestie, something went wrong" outcome. 😭

🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

Kernel file: ./net/netlabel/netlabel_kapi.c — and here are all the cross-refs, bestie, not a single one skipped:

• netlbl_cfg_map_del(9)
• netlbl_cfg_unlbl_map_add(9)
• netlbl_cfg_unlbl_static_add(9)
• netlbl_cfg_unlbl_static_del(9)
• netlbl_cfg_cipsov4_add(9)
• netlbl_cfg_cipsov4_del(9)
• netlbl_cfg_cipsov4_map_add(9)
• netlbl_cfg_calipso_add(9)
• netlbl_cfg_calipso_del(9)
• netlbl_cfg_calipso_map_add(9)
• _netlbl_catmap_getnode(9)
• netlbl_catmap_walk(9)
• netlbl_catmap_walkrng(9)
• netlbl_catmap_getlong(9)
• netlbl_catmap_setbit(9)
• netlbl_catmap_setrng(9)
• netlbl_catmap_setlong(9)
• netlbl_bitmap_walk(9)
• netlbl_bitmap_setbit(9)
• netlbl_enabled(9)
• netlbl_sock_setattr(9)
• netlbl_sock_delattr(9)
• netlbl_sock_getattr(9)
• netlbl_sk_lock_check(9)
• netlbl_conn_setattr(9)
• netlbl_req_setattr(9)
• netlbl_req_delattr(9)
• netlbl_skbuff_getattr(9)
• netlbl_skbuff_err(9)
• netlbl_cache_invalidate(9)
• netlbl_cache_add(9)
• netlbl_audit_start(9)
• netlbl_init(9)

💖 that's the whole page, bestie — source/version ./net/netlabel, dated October 2026. mwah, bye! 💖