mmu_interval...ifier_remove(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… mmu_interval...ifier_remove(9) β€” from the Kernel API Manual, bestie ✨

Ok so listen. We're in the Kernel API Manual today and the star of the show is mmu_interval_notifier_remove(9) β€” yes the header truncates it, yes it's giving "my name didn't fit on the eyeliner pencil", but that's literally the name, no cap. πŸŽ€


✨ NAME ✨

mmu_interval_notifier_remove β€” Remove a interval notifier 🧹


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

void mmu_interval_notifier_remove (struct mmu_interval_notifier
*interval_sub );

πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • interval_sub β€” the Interval subscription to unregister 🫢 Like, this is the thing you're yeeting out of the registry.

πŸ’– DESCRIPTION πŸ’–

Okay so this one has RULES, and the rules are not optional:

  • This function must be paired with mmu_interval_notifier_insert. They're a matched set, an iconic duo, you don't get one without the other. πŸ’«
  • It cannot be called from any ops callback. Like, absolutely not. Don't even think about it. πŸ™ˆ

And here's the payoff, the part that ate: once this returns, ops callbacks are no longer running on other CPUs and will not be called in future. Periodt. πŸ’€βœ¨ That's the whole vibe β€” you call it, and you know for a fact nobody's gonna slide into your callbacks afterwards.


πŸ‘‘ SEE ALSO πŸ‘‘

Kernel file ./mm/mmu_notifier.c, plus the whole friend group:


Okay that's the page, go touch some kernel code, ily 🫢 πŸ’–

This little number lives in ./mm and it's stamped October 2026 β€” so yeah, it's from the future, main character energy fr fr. πŸ’…β­πŸŒˆ

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from