mlx4_en_phc_enable(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… NAME πŸ’…

ok so bestie, welcome to the mlx4_en_phc_enable page β€” this is the mlx4_en_phc_enable(9) situation, from the Kernel API Manual (yes the manual name goes here, slay). what does it do? it enables or disables an ancillary feature. that's the whole vibe. keep reading tho 🫢


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

int mlx4_en_phc_enable (struct ptp_clock_info *ptp , struct
       ptp_clock_request *request , int on );

like, that's the signature. copy it exactly, don't come for me πŸ’€


πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • ptp β€” the ptp clock structure. yes queen, the clock struct, it's giving main character ✨
  • request β€” the desired resource to enable or disable. whatever it is you're trying to turn on (or off, no judgement)
  • on β€” the caller passes one to enable, or zero to disable. 1 = slay, 0 = not slay. simple as that πŸ”₯

🌸 DESCRIPTION 🌸

okay so the actual tea: this function enables (or disables) ancillary features of the PHC subsystem. iconic. BUT β€” and this is the important part, no cap β€” currently, no ancillary features are supported. literally none. zero. the feature list is empty. it's giving "we made the door but there's no room behind it" πŸ˜­πŸ™ˆ

so like, it exists, it takes your args, it goes in the request/on pipeline... and there's nothing on the other side yet. that's not a bug, that's just the current state, fr fr πŸ’œ


πŸ¦‹ SEE ALSO πŸ¦‹

all of these are in the friend group, check them out πŸ‘‘


ngl the "no ancillary features are supported" line is the whole plot twist here. don't forget it. it's load-bearing πŸ’…

k bye bestie, this page came from ./drivers/net/ethernet/mellano... and it's dated October 2026, page mlx4_en_phc_enable(9) β€” that's the footer energy, mwah πŸ’–β­πŸŒˆ

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from