memory_map_top_down(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’– NAME πŸ’–

memory_map_top_down β€” maps the range [map_start, map_end) top down, bestie. That's it, that's the whole vibe ✨

So yes, this is a page straight out of the Kernel API Manual, and we're about to get into it 🫢


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

void memory_map_top_down (unsigned long map_start , unsigned long map_end );

Like… that's the whole call. Two args, no return, no drama πŸ’…


πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • map_start β€” the start address of the target memory range. Where the party begins πŸŽ‰
  • map_end β€” the end address of the target memory range. Where it wraps up 🏁
Heads up: the range is [map_start, map_end) β€” square bracket on the left, round bracket on the right, meaning map_start is in and map_end is not. Classic half-open moment, iykyk πŸ’€

πŸ¦‹ DESCRIPTION πŸ¦‹

Okay so here's the tea πŸ“ β€” this function sets up the direct mapping for the memory range [map_start, map_end), and it does it in top-down order.

That said: the page tables get allocated at the end of the memory, and we map the memory top-down. No cap, that's literally how it goes πŸ‘‘


🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

  • The kernel file ./arch/x86/mm/init.c πŸ“
  • memory_map_bottom_up(9) β€” the other direction bestie, go say hi 🫢

and that's the whole page!! πŸ’œ This iconic little number comes from ./arch/x86/mm, dated October 2026, and honestly? memory_map_top_down(9) ate and left no crumbs πŸ’…πŸŽ€βœ¨

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from