match_mnt_flags(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… match_mnt_flags β€” Kernel API Manual, section 9 πŸŽ€

okay so bestie, welcome to the match_mnt_flags(9) page ✨ this one's a little function living in the kernel's AppArmor mount code, and honestly? she's doing an ordered match on mount flags, which is kind of the whole plot. let's get into it πŸ¦‹


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

aa_state_t match_mnt_flags (const struct aa_dfa *dfa , aa_state_t state
, unsigned long flags );

that's the whole vibe, no cap. three args in, one state out πŸ’…


🌸 ARGUMENTS 🌸

  • dfa β€” the dfa you're matching against, bestie. that's the automaton in question 🧚
  • state β€” the state you're starting from. like, where the walk begins ✨
  • flags β€” the mount flags you're matching against. yes, those flags πŸŽ€

πŸ’– DESCRIPTION πŸ’–

okay so here's the tea ⭐ mount flags are encoded as an ordered match. and the reason she does that instead of just checking against a simple bitmask? it's giving flexibility, because the ordered-match setup allows for logical operations on the flags πŸ”₯ that's the whole point β€” a plain bitmask check couldn't do that, so we don't do it. periodt πŸ’…


πŸ‘‘ RETURN πŸ‘‘

the next state after the flags match πŸ’« that's it, that's the return value, no extra lore 🫢


🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈


lowkey a reminder bestie: this page is from ./security/apparmor, and it's dated October 2026 β€” so if you're reading this in the future, hey, you're right on time 🌸 mwah, go read the rest of the family, they all slay πŸ’œ

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from