mailbox_chan_validate(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’– mailbox_chan_validate(9) πŸ’–

okay bestie, welcome to the mailbox_chan_validate(9) page from the Kernel API Manual ✨ this one's a little icon and it does exactly what it says on the tin β€” lets talk channel validation πŸŽ€


✨ NAME ✨

mailbox_chan_validate β€” validate your transport configuration and map those channels, no cap πŸ’…


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

int mailbox_chan_validate (struct device *cdev , int *a2p_rx_chan , int
*p2a_chan , int *p2a_rx_chan );

πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • cdev β€” a reference to the underlying transport device that's carrying the of_node descriptor we're gonna analyze 🫢
  • a2p_rx_chan β€” a reference to an optional unidirectional channel used for replies on the a2p channel. set it as zero if it's not present, mwah πŸ’‹
  • p2a_chan β€” a reference to the optional p2a channel. zero if not present, periodt ⭐
  • p2a_rx_chan β€” a reference to the optional p2a completion channel. yep, zero if not present too πŸ™ˆ

πŸŽ€ DESCRIPTION πŸŽ€

so first things first: it validates the transport configuration, as described in terms of appropriate to be use in the current configuration ✨ that's the whole vibe, iykyk πŸ’œ


πŸ’€ RETURN πŸ’€

0 on Success, or an error 😭


πŸ‘‘ SEE ALSO πŸ‘‘

  • Kernel file ./drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/transports/mailbox.c
  • struct scmi_mailbox(9)

okay that's the whole page bestie, go validate those channels πŸ’…βœ¨ this came from source ./drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/tr..., dated October 2026, and the header still says mailbox_chan_validate(9) β€” mwah, bye πŸ«ΆπŸŽ€πŸŒˆ

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from