lpfc_fabric_login_reqd(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’– NAME πŸ’–

Okay bestie, this is the Kernel API Manual page for lpfc_fabric_login_reqd(9) β€” manual name folded in right here so we don’t do the boring duplicated-header thing β€” and the function is lpfc_fabric_login_reqd. Its whole personality? Check if FLOGI required. That’s it. Tiny helper, big fabric energy. πŸ’…βœ¨

✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

Here’s the exact signature, character-for-character, no improv:

int lpfc_fabric_login_reqd (struct lpfc_hba *phba , struct lpfc_iocbq
*cmdiocb , struct lpfc_iocbq *rspiocb );

πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • phba β€” pointer to lpfc hba data structure. The HBA data-structure pointer, periodt.
  • cmdiocb β€” pointer to FDISC command iocb. FDISC command iocb, slay.
  • rspiocb β€” pointer to FDISC response iocb. FDISC response iocb, no cap.

πŸ¦‹ DESCRIPTION πŸ¦‹

This routine checks if a FLOGI is reguired for FDISC to succeed. Yes, reguired β€” that’s the original spelling and I’m preserving the manpage lore, bestie. The vibe check is literally: routine goes πŸ‘€, asks β€œdoes FDISC need FLOGI to succeed?” and that’s the whole plot. Iconic. πŸ’–

🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

Kernel file: ./drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c. And now the full friend group β€” I’m grouping them five-ish at a time so the terminal doesn’t spiral, but every single reference is here, fr fr:


Mwah πŸ’‹ β€” source path is ./drivers/scsi/lpfc, date is October 2026, and this whole cute little manual page is lpfc_fabric_login_reqd(9). Bye bestie, go check those FLOGIs responsibly! πŸ«ΆπŸ‘‘

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from