lpfc_ct_handle_mibreq(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… lpfc_ct_handle_mibreq(9) πŸ’…

okay so bestie, we're in the Kernel API Manual today and this one's a whole lil' function from the SCSI lpfc world β€” say hi to lpfc_ct_handle_mibreq πŸŽ€


✨ NAME ✨

lpfc_ct_handle_mibreq β€” the routine that processes an unsolicited CT MIB request data buffer. literally that's her job description, no cap 🫢


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

void lpfc_ct_handle_mibreq (struct lpfc_hba *phba , struct lpfc_iocbq *ctiocbq );
notice the void? she returns nothing. she does her thing and dips. πŸ’…

πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • phba β€” pointer to the lpfc hba data structure. yeah, the whole adapter's lore lives in there 🏠
  • ctiocbq β€” pointer to the lpfc CT command iocb data structure. this is the IOCB carrying the CT command tea β˜•

πŸ”₯ DESCRIPTION πŸ”₯

so this routine is used for processing the IOCB that's associated with an unsolicited CT MIB request. main character energy fr fr πŸ‘‘

first thing she does? she checks whether there's already an existing ndlp that matches the DID from that unsolicited IOCB. if there isn't one β€” she just returns. that's it. no ndlp, no service. goodbye, have a nice day 😭

side note: unsolicited here means nobody asked for it, and she's still showing up to handle it. iconic behaviour honestly 🌈

πŸ‘‘ SEE ALSO πŸ‘‘

that's the whole friend group bestie, go say hi to all of them πŸ’–βœ¨


aaaand that's the page!! sending you off with the sign-off: this lil' beauty lives in ./drivers/scsi/lpfc, stamped October 2026 β€” go read the source and slay, iykyk πŸŒΈπŸ’œπŸ“

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from