llc_conn_ac_inc_npta_value(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

✨ llc_conn_ac_inc_npta_value(9) ✨

okay so bestie, we're deep in the Kernel API Manual today and this one is genuinely a little gem πŸ’Ž β€” it's llc_conn_ac_inc_npta_value, and yes the name is a mouthful, no cap, but we're gonna get through it together 🫢


🌸 NAME 🌸

llc_conn_ac_inc_npta_value β€” tries to make value of npta greater ✨

like, that's literally its whole job. it's giving "one (1) task, and it's this" πŸ’…


πŸ¦‹ SYNOPSIS πŸ¦‹

int llc_conn_ac_inc_npta_value (struct sock *sk , struct sk_buff *skb );

that's it, that's the whole signature, copy it exactly pls, do not be out here renaming things πŸ™ˆ


πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • sk β€” the current connection structure. you know, the connection. the one we're currently on. main character of the struct world πŸ‘‘
  • skb β€” the current event. iconic, important, the thing that just happened πŸ’«

⭐ DESCRIPTION ⭐

so here's the tea πŸ“: after "inc_cntr" times of calling this action, "npta" increases by one. that's the whole mechanic β€” call it enough times, and the counter goes up by exactly 1. lowkey satisfying ngl.

and the vibe of this action is that it tries to make vale of "npta" greater as possible πŸ”₯ β€” it's gonna push that value up as far as it can. the consequence? number of acknowledgements decreases by increasing of "npta". so as "npta" goes up ⬆️, the acks go down ⬇️. that's the trade-off, that's the whole dynamic, periodt.

returns 0 for success, 1 otherwise 😌

ngl bestie, remember: 0 = slay, 1 = not slay. don't mix them up πŸ’€

πŸ’œ SEE ALSO πŸ’œ

Kernel file ./net/llc/llc_c_ac.c β€” go read it, it's right there:

that's the whole friend group, go say hi 🫢✨


🌈 and that's the page!! shoutout to ./net/llc for being the source, October 2026 for the date stamp, and the manual name llc_conn_ac_inc_npta_value(9) for being the star of the show πŸ’– mwah, bye bestie, go bump that npta πŸŽ€πŸ¦‹πŸ’…

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from