list_next_or_null_rcu(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

✨ list_next_or_null_rcu(9) ✨

okay so this is a page straight out of the Kernel API Manual (yes, the kernel has a manual, and yes it's lowkey iconic) β€” it's all about list_next_or_null_rcu, bestie. let's get into it πŸŽ€


🌸 NAME 🌸

list_next_or_null_rcu β€” grab the next element from a list, and be super chill about it πŸ’…


πŸ¦‹ SYNOPSIS πŸ¦‹

list_next_or_null_rcu (head , ptr , type , member );

like literally that's the whole call. four args, no drama ✨


πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • head β€” the head for the list. the actual list head, the main character of the whole operation πŸ‘‘
  • ptr β€” the list head you're taking the next element from. so we start here and look forward, iykyk
  • type β€” the type of the struct this is embedded in. tell the compiler what kinda struct we're living in fr fr
  • member β€” the name of the list_head within the struct. the lil field name that makes the magic work πŸͺ„

πŸ’– DESCRIPTION πŸ’–

okay so here's the vibe check: note that if ptr is at the end of the list, NULL is returned. so no, you're not getting garbage back, you're getting a polite little NULL. we love a safe return 🫢

and the actually important part β€” this primitive may safely run concurrently with the _rcu list-mutation primitives such as list_add_rcu, as long as it's guarded by rcu_read_lock. that's the whole deal, no cap. concurrent reads, rcU squad, everyone stays happy 😌

⚠️ bestie please don't forget the rcu_read_lock guard. that's the entire safety story, and skipping it is not the vibe πŸ’€

πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

this page has SO many friends, it's giving group chat energy. all of these live in the Kernel file ./include/linux/rculist.h:


aaaand that's the page! πŸ’œ this lil gem calls ./include/linux home, dated October 2026 β€” bestie that's a whole future date, main character energy fr. stay safe out there with your RCU lists, slay, periodt πŸŒˆπŸ’…

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from