layout_commit(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

✨ layout_commit(9) ✨

okay so bestie, buckle up β€” this is layout_commit, from the Kernel API Manual, and she's literally the one who figures out where your index nodes go before commit πŸ’…


πŸŽ€ NAME πŸŽ€

layout_commit β€” determine positions of index nodes to commit.

like, she does the seating chart for the index nodes before the commit party πŸͺ‘βœ¨


πŸ’– SYNOPSIS πŸ’–

int layout_commit (struct ubifs_info *c , int no_space , int cnt );

🌸 ARGUMENTS 🌸

  • c β€” the UBIFS file-system description object πŸ¦‹ (yes, the whole file-system's little description bestie)
  • no_space β€” this one flags that insufficient empty LEBs were allocated 😭 like the allocation didn't get enough empty LEBs
  • cnt β€” number of znodes to commit, fr fr

πŸ’« DESCRIPTION πŸ’«

So the job here is: calculate and update the positions of index nodes to commit. That's it, that's the vibe πŸ‘‘

But here's the plot twist: if there were an insufficient number of empty LEBs allocated, then the index nodes get placed into the gaps created by obsolete index nodes in non-empty index LEBs 🫢 For this purpose, an obsolete index node is one that was not in the index as at the end of the last commit. No cap β€” that's the definition, don't come for me.

And to write "in-the-gaps" requires that those index LEBs are updated atomically in-place πŸ”₯ that's a whole requirement, not a suggestion, so keep it in mind iykyk


πŸ¦‹ SEE ALSO πŸ¦‹

Kernel file ./fs/ubifs/tnc_commit.c β€” plus the whole friend group:


and that's the whole page, bestie πŸ§šπŸ’œ shoutout to ./fs/ubifs for the source, and this one's stamped October 2026, page layout_commit(9) β€” periodt 🌈⭐

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from