lan_reply(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

✨ lan_reply(9) β€” the kernel API manual's most unbothered little handler ✨

okay so bestie, we're in the lan_reply(9) page today, and honestly? it's a short one, so grab your iced coffee πŸ“ and let's go. this is the function that handles all the data sent from the hardware β€” yes, all of it, she's an overachiever, we love that for her πŸ’…


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

int lan_reply (MPT_ADAPTER *ioc , MPT_FRAME_HDR *mf , MPT_FRAME_HDR
*reply );

no cap, that's the whole signature. three args, one int coming back atcha πŸ”₯


πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • ioc β€” pointer to the MPT_ADAPTER structure. she's the main character here, the adapter herself πŸ‘‘
  • mf β€” pointer to the original MPT request frame. fair warning bestie: it's NULL if this is a TurboReply 🏎️✨ so vibe check your pointer before you dereference, iykyk
  • reply β€” pointer to the MPT reply frame. this is the actual messy group-chat message from the hardware πŸ’Œ

πŸ¦‹ DESCRIPTION πŸ¦‹

so what does she return? okay so this is the whole thing, listen up:

it returns 1, which means the original alloc'd request frame ptr should be freed. that's your green light to free it, bestie, go off 🫢

or it returns 0, which means it should not be freed. hands off. let her live 😭

that's it. that's the function. literally iconic for having exactly zero drama 🌈


🌟 SEE ALSO 🌟

kernel file ./drivers/message/fusion/mptlan.c β€” go read it if you want the full lore, I believe in you πŸ’œ


ngl the whole personality of this page is "returns 1 or 0" and honestly? same energy as a read receipt. either you got it or you didn't πŸŽ€

and that's a wrap, bestie β€” this little gem comes to you from the source/version <lavender>./drivers/message/fusion</lavender>, dated October 2026. slay, mwah, see you in the next manpage πŸ’–βœ¨πŸ§š

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from