kobject_has_children(9)
π kobject_has_children β a Kernel API Manual moment (section 9, bestie)
okay so picture this: it's the Kernel API Manual, and we're doing kobject_has_children(9). yes that's the whole vibe. come on in π
β¨ NAME β¨
kobject_has_children β literally just tells you whether a kobject has children or not. that's it. that's the whole function. she's simple, she's iconic, she slays π
π¦ SYNOPSIS π¦
bool kobject_has_children (struct kobject *kobj );
πΈ ARGUMENTS πΈ
kobjβ the object we're testing. the one we're asking about. the main character, if you will π
β DESCRIPTION β
so basically this returns whether a kobject has other kobjects hanging around as children. like, does she have a little squad of sub-kobjects under her? yes or no, bool, done. π«Ά
π important caveat, no cap: it does NOT account for the presence of attribute files β only sub directories. so don't come at her asking about attribute files, that's not her job, she will not answer.
π also, it assumes there is no concurrent addition or removal of such children. so it relies on external locking. read that again: external locking. she is not doing the locking for you, bestie β that's on you. don't set her up like that π
π₯ SEE ALSO π₯
Kernel file ./drivers/base/core.c β and like, a truly unserious number of friends. here they all are, every single one, no skips:
__fwnode_link_add(9)__fwnode_link_del(9)__fwnode_link_cycle(9)fwnode_links_purge_suppliers(9)fwnode_links_purge_consumers(9)fwnode_links_purge(9)__fwnode_links_move_consumers(9)__fw_devlink_pickup_dangling_consumers(9)fw_devlink_refresh_fwnode(9)device_is_dependent(9)device_pm_move_to_tail(9)device_link_wait_removal(9)device_link_add(9)device_link_del(9)device_link_remove(9)device_links_check_suppliers(9)__device_links_queue_sync_state(9)device_links_flush_sync_list(9)device_links_force_bind(9)device_links_driver_bound(9)__device_links_no_driver(9)device_links_no_driver(9)device_links_driver_cleanup(9)device_links_busy(9)device_links_unbind_consumers(9)device_links_purge(9)wait_for_init_devices_probe(9)fwnode_is_ancestor_of(9)fwnode_get_next_parent_dev(9)__fw_devlink_relax_cycles(9)fw_devlink_create_devlink(9)__fw_devlink_link_to_consumers(9)__fw_devlink_link_to_suppliers(9)dev_driver_string(9)device_release(9)devm_device_add_group(9)devices_kset_move_before(9)devices_kset_move_after(9)devices_kset_move_last(9)device_create_file(9)device_remove_file(9)device_remove_file_self(9)device_create_bin_file(9)device_remove_bin_file(9)device_initialize(9)dev_set_name(9)device_add(9)device_register(9)get_device(9)put_device(9)device_del(9)device_unregister(9)device_get_devnode(9)device_for_each_child(9)device_for_each_child_reverse(9)device_for_each_child_reverse_from(9)device_find_child(9)device_offline(9)device_online(9)__root_device_register(9)root_device_unregister(9)device_create(9)device_create_with_groups(9)device_destroy(9)device_rename(9)device_move(9)device_change_owner(9)device_shutdown(9)dev_err_probe(9)dev_warn_probe(9)set_primary_fwnode(9)set_secondary_fwnode(9)device_remove_of_node(9)device_add_of_node(9)device_set_of_node_from_dev(9)get_dev_from_fwnode(9)
iykyk π
that's the whole page, bestie β short and sweet, one bool, one very important locking disclaimer. and before you go: this little gem lives in ./drivers/base, it's dated October 2026, and it's brought to you by the Kernel API Manual (section 9, obviously π
). mwah, go check your locking πβ¨π¦
π¦ where this page comes from
- nixpkgs unstable: linux-manual 7.3.1
- π girlified by deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms