key_validate(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… key_validate(9) β€” from the Kernel API Manual, bestie

Okay so real talk, this one's short and sweet and honestly kind of a vibe check for keys. Stick around, it's like four lines of actual info and I've made it cute. πŸŽ€


✨ NAME ✨

key_validate β€” literally just validates a key. That's it. That's the whole job. πŸ¦‹


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

int key_validate (const struct key *key );

No cap, that's the exact signature β€” copy it character for character please, I am begging you. 🫢


🧚 ARGUMENTS 🧚

  • key β€” the key you want validated. The one under the microscope. The main character of this function, honestly. πŸ‘‘

πŸ”₯ DESCRIPTION πŸ”₯

So the whole point: it checks that a key is valid. That's the vibe. πŸ’…

Here's the return-value tea, and you're gonna want to memorise this because these negative numbers are highkey iconic:

  • It returns 0 if the key is okay β€” slay, we love a zero. ✨
  • It returns -ENOKEY if the key is invalidated.
  • It returns -EKEYREVOKED if the key's type has been removed, or if the key has been revoked. Yeah, two situations, same error β€” the way that it covers both? obsessed. 😭
  • It returns -EKEYEXPIRED if the key has expired. RIP to that key, it had a good run. πŸ’€
Not me listing every single error code because every single one of them matters β€” do not lump them together, bestie, they each mean something different and the kernel will notice. πŸ™ˆ

πŸ‘‘ SEE ALSO πŸ‘‘

  • Kernel file ./security/keys/permission.c
  • key_task_permission(9) β€” go read that one next, iykyk πŸ¦‹

That's the whole page, periodt. 🌈 This little gem lives over in ./security/keys, it's dated October 2026, and yeah β€” it's still key_validate(9) at the end of the day. Mwah. πŸ’–πŸŒΈπŸŽ€

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from