kernfs_remove(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… kernfs_remove β€” from the Kernel API Manual, bestie

Okay so picture this: it's giving "delete this whole tree, actually" energy. We're in kernfs_remove(9) territory, and honestly? It's iconic. Let me put you on. πŸŽ€


✨ NAME ✨

kernfs_remove β€” remove a kernfs_node recursively. Yes, recursively. It doesn't just take out the one thing, it takes out the whole friend group. 🫢


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

void kernfs_remove (struct kernfs_node *kn );

That's the whole thing. One argument, void return, no drama (mostly). ⭐


πŸ’– ARGUMENTS πŸ’–

  • kn β€” the kernfs_node to remove. That's it, that's the whole vibe check. Hand it over and it's gone gone. πŸ’€

πŸ¦‹ DESCRIPTION πŸ¦‹

Remove kn along with all its subdirectories and files.

That's the whole description, and tbh it ate. Not a single extra word, no cap. So like, be super sure before you call it β€” because everything nested under kn is coming with it. Every subdirectory. Every file. All of it. It's the main character of deletion, and the supporting cast does NOT survive. πŸ”₯ πŸ‘‘

Lowkey a good moment to double-check your pointer before you commit, bestie. Once it's in there, there's no undo button and no "wait no I didn't mean it" text. 😭

🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

Kernel file ./fs/kernfs/dir.c, plus the entire extended universe:


Okay that's the whole page, you're caught up, you're so smart, mwah. 🧚 Lives at ./fs/kernfs, dated October 2026 β€” kernfs_remove(9), out. πŸ’…βœ¨
πŸ“¦ where this page comes from