ixgbe_shoul..._cmd_execute(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’– ixgbe_should_retry_aci_send_cmd_execute(9) πŸ’–

okay so bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual β€” this is the page for ixgbe_should_retry_aci_send_cmd_execute, and yes the name is a whole mouthful, we're aware, we're choosing to slay anyway ✨


🌸 NAME 🌸

ixgbe_should_retry_aci_send_cmd_execute β€” literally just decides whether an ACI command should be resent 🫢


πŸŽ€ SYNOPSIS πŸŽ€

bool ixgbe_should_retry_aci_send_cmd_execute (u16 opcode );

she takes one u16 and hands you back a bool, no cap πŸ’…


πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • opcode β€” the ACI opcode. that's it, that's the whole argument. iconic behavior honestly πŸ‘‘

πŸ’œ DESCRIPTION πŸ’œ

so what she does is: check if the ACI command should be sent again, based on the opcode you handed her. like a vibe check for commands πŸ”₯

and when does that even happen? it may happen when the CSR is busy during link state changes β€” yes bestie, the CSR is busy, she's going through something, and sometimes you just gotta ask again later 😭


⭐ RETURN ⭐

  • true β€” if the sending command routine should be repeated πŸ”
  • otherwise false β€” no rerun for you, we move on 🌈

🧚 SEE ALSO 🧚

the kernel file for all this lives at:

./drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_e610.c

and now for the part where I hold up the entire friend group, because the see-also list here is long and every single one of them made the cut πŸ’–:

like… ninety-something functions. she's giving main character energy and a whole contact list πŸ˜­πŸ’…


ok that's the whole page bestie, go forth and retry those commands responsibly 🫢✨

mwah πŸ’‹ this page came from the source <code>./drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i...</code> and it's dated October 2026 β€” same manual name as the top (Kernel API Manual), same page name as the top (<code>ixgbe_shoul..._cmd_execute(9)</code>), because we keep it consistent in this house πŸŽ€

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from