ixgbe_check_...ent_response(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… ixgbe_check_component_response(9) β€” like, the Kernel API Manual glow-up ✨

okay bestie, welcome to the Kernel API Manual page for ixgbe_check_component_response(9) β€” yes the title's literally truncated in the header like that, no cap, that's just how it ships πŸŽ€


✨ NAME ✨

ixgbe_check_component_response β€” the girl whose whole job is reporting back what the firmware said about a component πŸ’–


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

int ixgbe_check_component_response (struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter , u8
response , u8 code , struct netlink_ext_ack *extack );

like, she takes four things and gives you back an int, periodt ✨


πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • adapter β€” the device private data structure, aka the main character's personal info πŸ’…
  • response β€” tells you whether this component can be updated (the vibe check, basically) πŸ‘€
  • code β€” the code that indicates the reason for that response, iykyk πŸ”₯
  • extack β€” the netlink extended ACK structure, the little messenger bag she drops errors into 🫢

πŸ’œ DESCRIPTION πŸ’œ

so what she does is: check whether the firmware is indicating that this component can be updated. that's it, that's the whole assignment πŸ’–

and if the component cannot be updated? she reports a suitable error message over the netlink extended ACK. she's not gonna let you sit there wondering, ngl 😭✨


⭐ RETURN ⭐

  • 0 β€” slay! the component can be updated πŸŽ‰
  • -ECANCELED β€” nope, the firmware indicates the component cannot be updated πŸ’€

🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

the whole friend group fr fr 🫢✨


okay that's the page!! it's from ./drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i... (yes, that's the source, it's cut off just like that, don't come for me πŸ™ˆ) and it's dated October 2026. mwah, bye bestie πŸ’‹πŸ’–πŸŽ€
πŸ“¦ where this page comes from