ixd_ctlq_init_sparams(9)
okay so bestie, buckle in β this is ixd_ctlq_init_sparams(9), straight out of the Kernel API Manual, and she's lowkey a one-job icon π
πΈ NAME πΈ
ixd_ctlq_init_sparams β Initialize control queue send parameters β¨
Like, that's it. That's the job. She initializes the send params for the control queue and she does it flawlessly, periodt π
β¨ SYNOPSIS β¨
void ixd_ctlq_init_sparams (struct ixd_adapter *adapter , struct libie_ctlq_xn_send_params *sparams , void *msg_buf , size_t msg_size );
void bestie β she returns nothing. she does the thing and she leaves. no receipts, no notes, just vibes π«Ά
π ARGUMENTS π
adapterβ the adapter, and listen π it has to come with an initialized mailbox. That's the whole prerequisite, iykyk. No initialized mailbox, no slay πsparamsβ the parameters you're initializing. literally the reason we're all here πmsg_bufβ a DMA-mappable pointer to the message being sent. DMA-mappable is not a suggestion, bestie β don't be out here passing random pointers, that's giving chaos πmsg_sizeβ the message size. yes. that's the size. of the message. she's simple, she's direct, she ate πΈ
π¦ SEE ALSO π¦
- Kernel file
./drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixd/ixd_ctlq.cβ the literal source file, go read her, she's iconic π ixd_ctlq_clean_sq(9)ixd_ctlq_do_req(9)ixd_ctlq_handle_msg(9)ixd_ctlq_recv_mb_msg(9)ixd_ctlq_rx_task(9)
like the whole ctlq friend group, fr fr π§
and that's the page, bestie!! mwah π this vibe check was brought to you by ./drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixd, October 2026, and the one and only ixd_ctlq_init_sparams(9) β go forth and initialize those params πβ
π¦ where this page comes from
- nixpkgs unstable: linux-manual 7.3.1
- π girlified by deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms