ixd_ctlq_init_sparams(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

okay so bestie, buckle in β€” this is ixd_ctlq_init_sparams(9), straight out of the Kernel API Manual, and she's lowkey a one-job icon πŸ’…

🌸 NAME 🌸

ixd_ctlq_init_sparams β€” Initialize control queue send parameters ✨

Like, that's it. That's the job. She initializes the send params for the control queue and she does it flawlessly, periodt πŸŽ€

✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

void ixd_ctlq_init_sparams (struct ixd_adapter *adapter , struct libie_ctlq_xn_send_params *sparams , void *msg_buf , size_t msg_size );

void bestie β€” she returns nothing. she does the thing and she leaves. no receipts, no notes, just vibes 🫢

πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • adapter β€” the adapter, and listen πŸ‘ it has to come with an initialized mailbox. That's the whole prerequisite, iykyk. No initialized mailbox, no slay 😭
  • sparams β€” the parameters you're initializing. literally the reason we're all here πŸ‘‘
  • msg_buf β€” a DMA-mappable pointer to the message being sent. DMA-mappable is not a suggestion, bestie β€” don't be out here passing random pointers, that's giving chaos πŸ’€
  • msg_size β€” the message size. yes. that's the size. of the message. she's simple, she's direct, she ate 🌸

πŸ¦‹ SEE ALSO πŸ¦‹

like the whole ctlq friend group, fr fr 🧚


and that's the page, bestie!! mwah πŸ’‹ this vibe check was brought to you by ./drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixd, October 2026, and the one and only ixd_ctlq_init_sparams(9) β€” go forth and initialize those params 🌈⭐

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from