iwl_drv_stop(9)
π iwl_drv_stop(9) β from the Kernel API Manual, bestie
Okay so real talk β we're in the Kernel API Manual today and the main character of this page is iwl_drv_stop. Buckle up, it's a short one but it matters.
β¨ NAME β¨
iwl_drv_stop β stop the drv. That's it. That's the whole job. π
π¦ SYNOPSIS π¦
void iwl_drv_stop (struct iwl_drv *drv );
Void return, one pointer in, no drama. She takes exactly one (1) argument and she's not asking for a second. π
πΈ ARGUMENTS πΈ
drvβ thestruct iwl_drv *in question. Yes queen, that's the one you're stopping.
π DESCRIPTION π
Stop the driver. Simple as that, no cap. π
Okay but here's the part where you gotta pay attention, bestie β this function should be called by bus specific system flows implementations. Like, the bus-specific code is the one responsible for invoking it, not random other code that just felt like it. π₯
Concrete example, because I know you're gonna ask: the bus specific remove function should call this function first, and then do the bus related operations only. First iwl_drv_stop, then the bus stuff. In that order. The way that order is non-negotiable?? Iconic. π
π§ SEE ALSO π§
- Kernel file
./drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-drv.h - Driver system flows β
drv component(9) iwl_drv_start(9)β yeah the opposite one, go read it too π«Ά
Ngl the whole vibe here is "one function, one job, one very specific caller." Respect the ordering and you're golden. β
<div>So yeah, that's the page π β straight from the Kernel API Manual, sourced from ./drivers/net/wireless/intel/i..., dated October 2026, and closing out with that iwl_drv_stop(9) energy. Slay, bye! π</div>
π¦ where this page comes from
- nixpkgs unstable: linux-manual 7.3.1
- π girlified by deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms