ipe_mmap_file(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… ipe_mmap_file(9) β€” like, the Kernel API Manual, bestie πŸŽ€

okay so this is ipe_mmap_file from the Kernel API Manual, and honestly? it's giving gatekeeper energy in the best way possible. let's get into it ✨


🌸 NAME 🌸

ipe_mmap_file β€” the ipe security hook function for the mmap check. no cap, that's literally her whole job πŸ’…


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

int ipe_mmap_file (struct file *f , unsigned long reqprot , unsigned
long prot , unsigned long flags );

πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • f β€” the file that's being mmap'd, aka the main character here. heads up: this can be NULL when we're dealing with anonymous memory, so don't panic if she's a little empty inside πŸ™ˆ
  • reqprot β€” the requested protection on the mmap, handed down straight from usermode. it's giving "what the user thinks they want" πŸ’­
  • prot β€” the effective protection on the mmap, which gets resolved from reqprot plus the system configuration. so yeah, this is the glow-up version after the system has had its say ✨
  • flags β€” unused. she's just here for the vibes, not doing anything, lowkey iconic for that πŸ’€

πŸ’– DESCRIPTION πŸ’–

this hook gets called when a file is loaded through the mmap family of system calls. that's it, that's the whole vibe check. whenever the mmap squad rolls up, this function says hi πŸ‘‹πŸ«Ά


πŸ”₯ RETURN πŸ”₯

  • 0 β€” Success πŸ’š slay, we passed, everything's fine and cute
  • -EACCES β€” Did not pass IPE policy 😭 bestie got blocked at the door, it's a whole thing

🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

Kernel file ./security/ipe/hooks.c β€” go read it if you're nosy (respectfully) πŸ‘€

ok real talk: if f is NULL, that's the anonymous-memory case β€” not a bug, not a mistake, just how it is. handle it gracefully, bestie 🫢

that's the whole page, pookie! this one comes from ./security/ipe, dated October 2026, and yes she's filed under ipe_mmap_file(9) β€” periodt. πŸ§šπŸ’œ

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from