ipack_bus_register(9)
β¨ NAME β¨
ipack_bus_register β bestie, this is the one that registers a brand-new ipack bus π (this page lives in the Kernel API Manual, section 9, iykyk)
πΈ SYNOPSIS πΈ
struct ipack_bus_device * ipack_bus_register (struct device *parent ,
int slots , const struct ipack_bus_ops *ops , struct module *owner );
π¦ ARGUMENTS π¦
parentβ a pointer to the parent device, if there is one at all (no pressure, it's optional energy β¨).slotsβ how many slots the bus device has available, like literally the slot count π .opsβ the bus operations for the mezzanine drivers. yes, the whole ops vibe, hand it over π«Ά.ownerβ ok so the original page literally just says-- undescribed --and honestly? not me exposing the manpage like this π we move on.
π DESCRIPTION π
So here's the tea: the carrier board device should call this function to register itself as an available bus device in ipack. that's the whole assignment. main character energy, but make it a bus device π
ngl it's giving "hi yes I exist, I'm a bus now, come find me in ipack."
π RETURN π
NULLon error πstruct ipack_bus_deviceon success π slay
β SEE ALSO β
Kernel file ./include/linux/ipack.h, plus the whole friend group:
struct ipack_device(9)struct ipack_driver_ops(9)struct ipack_driver(9)struct ipack_bus_ops(9)struct ipack_bus_device(9)ipack_bus_unregister(9)ipack_driver_register(9)ipack_device_init(9)ipack_device_add(9)DEFINE_IPACK_DEVICE_TABLE(9)IPACK_DEVICE(9)ipack_get_carrier(9)
π«Ά friendly reminder: owner is still out here undocumented, and that's just how the page shipped. we don't invent facts in this group chat, periodt.
that's the whole page, bestie β straight from ./include/linux, dated October 2026, and yes the header still says ipack_bus_register(9) because we keep the receipts ππ§ββοΈ
π¦ where this page comes from
- nixpkgs unstable: linux-manual 7.3.1
- π girlified by deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 on : a language model's rewrite of the original, under its terms