init_tx_pools(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… init_tx_pools(9) β€” like, the kernel API manual bestie πŸŽ€

okay so this is init_tx_pools from the Kernel API Manual, and honestly? she's a whole vibe. let's get into it πŸ¦‹


✨ NAME ✨

init_tx_pools β€” Initialize the set of transmit pools in the adapter. ✨

🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

int init_tx_pools (struct net_device *netdev );

πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • netdev β€” the net device associated with the vnic interface. that's her whole identity fr πŸ’…

πŸ¦‹ DESCRIPTION πŸ¦‹

okay so picture this: you gotta initialize the set of transmit pools in the ibmvnic adapter that's associated with the net_device netdev. that's the assignment. πŸ”₯

and like β€” if possible, just reuse the existing tx pools. why do extra work when you don't have to, right? queen behavior. πŸ‘‘

but if you can't reuse them? then it's giving spring cleaning: free any existing pools and allocate a new set of pools before initializing them. out with the old, in with the new, periodt. πŸ’€βœ¨

πŸ’– RETURN πŸ’–

  • 0 on success 🫢
  • a negative value on error 😭
ngl bestie, check that return value. a negative number is NOT the slay you think it is.

🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

go read the whole friend group, they're all iconic iykyk πŸ’œ


and that's the page!! 🌟 courtesy of the source/version at ./drivers/net/ethernet/ibm, dated October 2026, and yeah β€” this is init_tx_pools(9) signing off. mwah πŸ’‹πŸŽ€

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from