ih_v6_1_irq_rearm(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… ih_v6_1_irq_rearm(9) β€” from the Kernel API Manual

okay so bestie, picture this: you're deep in the AMDGPU interrupt handler, the IRQ got lost somewhere in the void, and nobody's answering. this page is literally the "hey, u up? pls try again" function for exactly that situation. it's giving customer-service energy for interrupts. πŸŽ€


✨ NAME ✨

ih_v6_1_irq_rearm β€” rearm IRQ if lost πŸ’–

like, if the interrupt went missing, this is the little nudge that gets it back on its feet.


πŸ¦‹ SYNOPSIS πŸ¦‹

void ih_v6_1_irq_rearm (struct amdgpu_device *adev , struct
       amdgpu_ih_ring *ih );

returns void, so don't go looking for a return value, there isn't one, periodt.


🌸 ARGUMENTS 🌸

  • adev β€” amdgpu_device pointer πŸ”₯ your ticket to the whole device, the main character of the AMDGPU world.
  • ih β€” amdgpu_ih_ring pointer πŸ‘‘ the specific interrupt handler ring we're talking about here.

🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈

lowkey the whole friend group lives in one file, and that file is:

  • Kernel file ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/ih_v6_1.c

and here's the rest of the squad, all in (9) section, all iconic:

iykyk, just go read them if you're nosy like me 🫢


ngl, if you're calling this you probably already suspect the IRQ ghosted you. rearm, recheck, and move on πŸ’€

and that's a wrap, bestie! 🧚 this page came from ./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu, dated October 2026, and it lives in the Kernel API Manual β€” go forth and keep those interrupts from getting lost πŸ’œβœ¨

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from