ibmvscsi_send_srp_event(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

okay so bestie, welcome to the ibmvscsi_send_srp_event(9) manual page, straight outta the Kernel API Manual β€” and bestie, we are keeping every single detail today, no cap, because this kernel function is lowkey important and the vibe check is immaculate πŸ’…βœ¨

🌸 NAME 🌸

The main character energy: ibmvscsi_send_srp_event transforms event to a u64 array and calls send_crq(). That's it, that's the name-drop, and honestly? slay. πŸŽ€

⭐ SYNOPSIS ⭐

Here's the signature, copy it exactly β€” no autocorrect, no vibes-based renaming πŸ™ˆ:

enum scsi_qc_status ibmvscsi_send_srp_event (struct srp_event_struct
     *evt_struct , struct ibmvscsi_host_data *hostdata , unsigned long
     timeout );

πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

Three besties walk into this function, and they are:

  • evt_struct β€” the evt_struct to be sent. Yes, that exact one. πŸ’Œ
  • hostdata β€” the ibmvscsi_host_data of host. host data, but make it fashion. πŸ‘‘
  • timeout β€” timeout in seconds; 0 means do not time command. zero = no timer, periodt. ⏰

✨ DESCRIPTION ✨

Okay so the tea: this returns the value returned from ibmvscsi_send_crq. Zero for success β€” that's the happy path, bestie, the green check, the slay. 🫢

Also, just so we're clear, it's the function that transforms event to a u64 array and calls send_crq() β€” that's literally the NAME section, but make it a vibe. 😌

🚨 Caveat, and it's a big one: this routine assumes that host_lock is held for synchronization. The way that it assumes this is lowkey giving "trust me bro" β€” so respect the lock, periodt. πŸ’€

πŸ¦‹ SEE ALSO πŸ¦‹

Go read these next, fr fr β€” I'm obsessed with a good SEE ALSO list, and this one is full list, nobody gets left behind, iykyk:


mwah πŸ’‹ this little love letter is from source/version ./drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi, dated October 2026, and yes bestie, it's the ibmvscsi_send_srp_event(9) page signing off. Bye, go hold that host_lock. πŸ’–βœ¨

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from