ib_dma_map_bvec(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… ib_dma_map_bvec β€” like, the kernel API manual, but make it make sense

okay so bestie, this is a page from the Kernel API Manual (ib_dma_map_bvec(9), section 9) and honestly? it's short but it matters. buckle up πŸŽ€


✨ NAME ✨

ib_dma_map_bvec β€” the girlies that map a bio_vec to a DMA address πŸ’«


🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

u64 ib_dma_map_bvec (struct ib_device *dev , struct bio_vec *bvec , enum
dma_data_direction direction );

that's the whole signature, no cap. u64 in, vibes out ✨


πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • dev β€” the device the dma_addr is gonna be created for. like, the main character of this whole operation πŸ‘‘
  • bvec β€” the bio_vec we're mapping. yes queen, that one πŸ“
  • direction β€” the direction of the DMA. gotta know which way the data's flowing fr fr 🌈

πŸ’– DESCRIPTION πŸ’–

so what it does: it returns a DMA address for the bio_vec. that's the whole slay πŸ’…

BUT β€” and this is the part where you listen to me β€” the caller must check the result with ib_dma_mapping_error before use. periodt. and a failed mapping must not be passed to ib_dma_unmap_bvec. like ever. don't do it. i'm serious 😭

⚠️ okay so real talk: ib_dma_mapping_error check = mandatory before you touch that result. failed mapping β†’ never hand it to ib_dma_unmap_bvec. that's the rule, bestie, and it's not negotiable πŸ’€

and for software RDMA devices (rxe, siw), it returns a virtual address and no actual DMA mapping occurs. lowkey iconic behaviour honestly 🌸


πŸ”₯ SEE ALSO πŸ”₯

okay this list is long β€” like, unhinged long β€” but every single one is here because i would never do you dirty like that. also peep the kernel file ./include/rdma/ib_verbs.h πŸ‘€

ik that was a lot but we got through it together 🫢


and that's the page!! 🧚 this little beauty lives at ./include/rdma, it's dated October 2026, and it answers to the name ib_dma_map_bvec(9) β€” mwah, go check your mapping errors, ily, bye πŸ’œπŸŽ€

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from