i40e_vc_send_resp_to_vf(9)

📦 version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

💅 i40e_vc_send_resp_to_vf 💅

okay so bestie, you've stumbled into the Kernel API Manual — this is i40e_vc_send_resp_to_vf(9), and yes we're reading a manpage together, this is our bonding time 🫶

✨ NAME ✨

i40e_vc_send_resp_to_vf — and tbh the original gave us zero tagline here, like the description slot is just… empty 💀 so no blurb, no hype line, just the name. We move.

🌸 SYNOPSIS 🌸

int i40e_vc_send_resp_to_vf (struct i40e_vf *vf , enum virtchnl_ops opcode , int retval );

int in, three args, that's the whole vibe. Slay.

🎀 ARGUMENTS 🎀

  • vf — pointer to the VF info 🦋 literally just a pointer to the VF's info struct, that's the whole thing.
  • opcode — operation code. the code that says which op we're doing, iykyk.
  • retval — return value. the value we're returning, bestie, it's right there in the name.

💖 DESCRIPTION 💖

send resp msg to VF 💅

that's it. that's the description. short, sweet, main character energy — it sends a response message to the VF, periodt. no extra lore, no hidden caveats, nothing else in the source text, so don't come for me, I'm not adding anything 🔥

🦋 SEE ALSO 🦋

the kernel file lives at ./drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_virtchnl_pf.c, and the guest list for this function is genuinely enormous — like a group chat with 90+ people in it 😭 all of these, no cap:

^^ that's the whole list, untouched, every single one, I would never do you like that and skip some 🧚

💀 quick reminder bestie: I kept every fact exactly as the source gave it. The description really is just "send resp msg to VF" — no extra behaviour, no return-value lore, no error list. If it's not here, it wasn't there.

and that's the page! 🌈 this lil kernel doc came from ./drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e, dated October 2026, and it answers to the name i40e_vc_send_resp_to_vf(9) — mwah, bye bestie 💜✨

📦 where this page comes from