hwme_set_request_sync(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… hwme_set_request_sync(9) β€” from the Kernel API Manual, bestie ✨

Okay so picture this: you're deep in the kernel, you've got a ca8210 driver staring at you, and you need a HWME_SET_request/confirm situation handled "according to API Spec" πŸŽ€ β€” that's literally this function's whole job. It's giving "the spec said so, so I did it" energy.


🌸 NAME 🌸

hwme_set_request_sync β€” does the HWME_SET_request/confirm thing according to API Spec. No cap, that's the whole name up front so you never get lost πŸ’–


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

u8 hwme_set_request_sync (u8 hw_attribute , u8 hw_attribute_length , u8
*hw_attribute_value , void *device_ref );

Look at that signature, iconic. Four things go in, one u8 comes out πŸ¦‹


πŸŽ€ ARGUMENTS πŸŽ€

  • hw_attribute β€” the Attribute Number. Which attribute are we messing with? This one πŸ”₯
  • hw_attribute_length β€” the Attribute length. Gotta know how much of the thing there is πŸ“
  • hw_attribute_value β€” Pointer to Attribute Value. It's a pointer, it's pointing at the value, we move 😌
  • device_ref β€” a Nondescript pointer to the target device. Nondescript. The manpage said it, not me πŸ’€ just a lil mystery pointer, love that for us

πŸ‘‘ RETURN πŸ‘‘

You get back an 802.15.4 status code of HWME-SET.confirm β€” that's the vibe check result, so read it before you act like everything slayed 🌈


πŸ’œ SEE ALSO πŸ’œ

Kernel file ./drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c β€” and honestly the whole friend group shows up here, so let me hand out the invites one by one 🫢

Like, that's the entire group chat and every single one of them got @'d. No one left on read πŸ’…


Byeee bestie β€” this page came to you from ./drivers/net/ieee802154, dated October 2026 πŸ“ Go set those attributes, you absolute main character 🧚

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from