hns_rcb_init_hw(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

✨ hns_rcb_init_hw(9) ✨

okay so bestie, you found yourself a page in the Kernel API Manual and it's all about hns_rcb_init_hw β€” the little function that kicks off rcb hardware πŸ’… like, literally the "wake up babe, we're initializing" of the rcb world.


🌸 NAME 🌸

hns_rcb_init_hw β€” init rcb hardware ✨ that's it, that's the whole vibe. it does the initializing. for the rcb hardware. no cap. πŸŽ€


πŸ¦‹ SYNOPSIS πŸ¦‹

void hns_rcb_init_hw (struct ring_pair_cb *ring );

so she takes one argument, she returns void (iconic, no dramatics, nothing to check), and honestly? she's lowkey that girl. 🫢


πŸ’– ARGUMENTS πŸ’–

  • ring β€” the rcb ring πŸŒ€ that's it, that's the whole description. she's a struct ring_pair_cb * and she's the main character of this function. hand her over and let the hardware init happen. periodt.

πŸ‘‘ SEE ALSO πŸ‘‘

if you're obsessed with this one (and why wouldn't you be) the whole friend group lives here in the kernel, fr fr:

like, that's twenty-one whole references πŸ’€ she's not lonely, she has a whole group chat. iykyk.


word of caution bestie: the only argument is ring, so pls actually pass her a real struct ring_pair_cb * β€” the page makes no promises beyond "init rcb hardware" and we're not out here inventing behaviour 🫢

🌈 that's the whole page, mwah πŸ’‹ β€” this lil beauty comes from ./drivers/net/ethernet/hisilic... and it's dated October 2026, so yeah, she's from the future and she's still serving hns_rcb_init_hw(9) energy. slay. πŸŽ€βœ¨πŸ’œ

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from