hlist_nulls_add_head_rcu(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

okay so bestie, welcome to the hlist_nulls_add_head_rcu(9) page from the Kernel API Manual πŸ’…βœ¨ this one is short but it has receipts, so let's get into it.

🌸 NAME 🌸

hlist_nulls_add_head_rcu β€”

and that's literally it, bestie 😭 the original NAME line is just that dash with nothing after it. no description, no extra lore, no cap.


πŸŽ€ SYNOPSIS πŸŽ€

void hlist_nulls_add_head_rcu (struct hlist_nulls_node *n , struct hlist_nulls_head *h );

✨ ARGUMENTS ✨

  • n β€” the element you're adding to the hash list, bestie 🫢
  • h β€” the list you're adding it to πŸ’–

πŸ¦‹ DESCRIPTION πŸ¦‹

okay so this function adds the specified element to the specified hlist_nulls, while still permitting racing traversals. iconic behavior, honestly ✨

the caller has to take whatever precautions are necessary β€” like holding the appropriate locks β€” to avoid racing with another list-mutation primitive, such as hlist_nulls_add_head_rcu or hlist_nulls_del_rcu, running on this same list. yes, that means you, bestie: protect your mutations πŸ™ˆ

however, it is perfectly legal to run concurrently with the _rcu list-traversal primitives, such as hlist_nulls_for_each_entry_rcu, which are used to prevent memory-consistency problems on Alpha CPUs. highkey important detail, don't skip it πŸ’€

and regardless of the type of CPU, the list-traversal primitive must be guarded by rcu_read_lock. periodt. πŸ”₯

⚠️ caveat check: the mutation side needs proper precautions against other list mutations; the traversal side still needs rcu_read_lock, no matter the CPU. that's the whole vibe check.

🌈 SEE ALSO 🌈


this lil page says it's from ./include/linux, dated October 2026, and it's the hlist_nulls_add_head_rcu(9) manual page β€” mwah πŸ’‹πŸŽ€

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from