hl_pci_bars_map(9)

πŸ“¦ version 7.3.1, in nixpkgs unstable

πŸ’… hl_pci_bars_map β€” bestie, we're mapping PCI BARs today

Okay so real talk, this is the hl_pci_bars_map page from the kernel API manual (that's the hl_pci_bars_map(9) situation, section 9, kernel docs energy ✨). Strap in, it's short but it's important. 🫢


🌸 NAME 🌸

hl_pci_bars_map β€” literally here to map PCI BARs. That's the whole personality. πŸ’…


✨ SYNOPSIS ✨

int hl_pci_bars_map (struct hl_device *hdev , const char * const name[3] , bool is_wc[3] );

No cap, that's the whole signature, copy it exactly, don't be cute with it. πŸŽ€


πŸ¦‹ ARGUMENTS πŸ¦‹

  • hdev β€” a pointer to the hl_device structure. It's the main character of this whole function, everything else is just supporting cast. πŸ‘‘
  • name β€” an array of BAR names. Yes, an array. Plural. It knows what it is. πŸ“
  • is_wc β€” an array holding a flag per BAR, saying whether that BAR needs a write-combined mapping. So like, one little boolean bestie per BAR telling us the vibe it needs. 🌈

πŸ’– DESCRIPTION πŸ’–

So what does it actually do? Two things, and they're both iconic:

  1. It requests PCI regions.
  2. It maps them to kernel virtual addresses.

That's it. That's the function. Request, then map. Serving looks and doing memory things. πŸ”₯


⭐ RETURN ⭐

  • 0 on success β€” slay, we ate, everything mapped. πŸ’…
  • non-zero for failure β€” 😭 something went sideways, check your regions.
Fr fr, don't ignore the non-zero case. It's giving "I'm fine" when it is not fine. πŸ’€

🧚 SEE ALSO 🧚

Sibling energy all the way down, go read these next:


Okay that's the whole page, 10/10 no notes 🌈

Huge thanks to the <pink>./drivers/accel/habanalabs/com...</pink> era of the kernel tree for bringing us this one β€” that's the source/version line, and the date stamp on it is <purple>October 2026</purple>. And yes, the page footer is also hl_pci_bars_map(9) because it's consistent like that. Bye bestie, go map some BARs responsibly πŸ’œπŸ¦‹βœ¨

πŸ“¦ where this page comes from